Legal Opinion

Onie Mae Ward v. Reginald Moore Mike Russell Ollie Collins

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 18, 2005No. 04-2138PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Onie Mae Ward sued Reginald Moore, Mike Russell, and Ollie Collins — officers of the Osceola, Arkansas Police Department — for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, and the district court denied their motion. The defendants now bring this interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

Ward filed her initial complaint against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Michael Dunham Murphy v. Missouri Department of Corrections Winfrey Dickerson Dora B. Schriro Elijah Nagbe Steve Long Michael KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Christopher Lee Prosser v. Davis L. Ross, Co ICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Mark E. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Harry W. SPEAR, Appellant, v. Dayton's, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McKenney v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Ambrose v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. ADVANCED OPTICS ELECTRONICS, INC. v. RobinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API