Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Barry Yao Company, a Copartnership, and Barry Yao, an Individual, Bankrupts. Francis F. Quittner v. Bertram S. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1961No. 16701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

In a bankruptcy proceeding in the Southern District of California, Francis F. Quittner, Quittner & Stutman, Milford S. Zimmerman, and Zimmerman, Kelly & Thody, hereinafter called the appellants, were appointed as special counsel for the receiver to represent him in contesting the will of Lottie Barry in a proceeding then pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. 1 Pri- or to the appointment by the referee the appellants were informed that their compensation would be contingent upon recovery. Approximately six months later the will contest was settled, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
  2. In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In The Matter Of Evangeline Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. In the Matter of Arlan's Dept. Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Charles N. Wooten, Ltd. (In re Evangeline Refining Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API