Legal Opinion
United States v. CFW Const. Co., Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 1, 1984No. Crim. 83-300PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
The defendant, CFW Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter “CFW”), has been indicted for two counts of conspiring to artificially establish bidding prices (i.e., “rig” bids) on two utility construction projects in South Carolina, in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1976). One such violation allegedly occurred during the period March to October, 1978, and the second violation allegedly took place during the period December 1978 to March 1979. The matter is now before the court upon CFW’s motion to dismiss the indictment, which is based upon the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. A-A-A Electrical Company, Inc. & William T. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. LaskowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. A-A-A Electrical Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- United States v. Cfw Construction Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. FitzgibbonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985