Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kennedy v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1976No. 75-1093PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that Section 2, Article X of the Fáirview Park charter, which makes' provision for the filing of referendum petitions in that municipality, is in conflict'with R. C. 3501.11 (K), and therefore controlling, because it concerns a matter of local self-government. See Fitzgerald v. Cleveland (1913), 88 Ohio St. 338, and progeny. It is appellant’s position that because Section, 2, Article X requires the clerk of council to determine the sufficiency of a referendum petition, the board of elections is thereafter without power to do so, and acts in a purely ministerial cápácity to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. BigelowOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. McGinley v. BlissOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State ex rel. Janasik v. SarosyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Ehring v. BlissOhio Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Ryant Committee v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. The Ryant Commt. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Greene v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API