Legal Opinion

Davis v. Knipp

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Chemung county. Action by Charles Davis, as receiver of the Elmira National Bank, against Charles H. Knipp, on a promissory note. A demurrer to the answer was sustained, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.

In the complaint it is alleged that the Elmira National Bank was incorporated as a national banking association on August 1, 1887, under the laws of the United States, and as such carried on the business of banking at Elmira down to and until the 23d day of May, 1893, when it became insolvent, closed its doors, and then and there suspended and discontinued its business, and has not since resumed the same; that on the 26th May, 1893, the comptroller of the currency of the United States, having become satisfied of the insolvency of the bank, and being thereto duly authorized by law, appointed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Case v. TerrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Robinson v. . National Bank of NewberneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Hughitt v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kilby v. First National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. O'Connell v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Crystal Bay Corp. v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API