Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Jorling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The contention of petitioner that the procedures employed at his permit revocation hearing deprived him of due process is devoid of merit. Although petitioner had the right to be represented by counsel at the revocation hearing, that right was conferred by administrative regulation (see, 6 NYCRR 622.12 [b] [1] [now 6 NYCRR 622.10 (c) (1)]) and was not guaranteed by the constitutional right to due process (see, Matter of Smith v Passidomo, 120 AD2d 599). Thus, the failure to advise petitioner that he had the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirk v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Smith v. PassidomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Crittenden v. O'HareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API