Legal Opinion

Butler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1992No. 60250PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Judge.

Movant Benjamin Butler appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant filed his transcript on direct appeal on November 16, 1990 but did not file his pro se motion until December 18, 1990, thus failing to meet the thirty day deadline mandated by Rule 29.15(b). We vacate the judgment of the motion court and remand with directions to dismiss the motion as untimely filed.

Movant was convicted by a jury of an illegal sale of crack cocaine. The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Suman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swofford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Edgington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Whitby v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Forister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API