Legal Opinion

Nonnamaker v. Lively

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1923No. 14732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.

This action was brought to recover a forfeiture or liquidated damages for failure to comply with the terms of an oil and gas lease. The case was tried to a jury and verdict returned for plaintiff, upon which judgment was rendered. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled March 29, 1923, and 90 days allowed in which to prepare and serve ease-made. This 90 day period expired June 27th, without case-made having been served or an additional extension of time having been applied for or granted. On June 28th following, an order was entered by the trial court granting an extension of 60…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowers v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Colbert v. HiggambothamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. In Re Determination of Heirship of Isparhecher SarwarhieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. In Re Estate of StoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. City of Ada v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Maben v. Tulsa Motor Security Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API