Legal Opinion

Craig v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1992No. 19696PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

James Craig’s parole was revoked because of positive tests for the use of controlled substances. He later filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that his parole was revoked based upon insufficient evidence, violating his right to due process. He received no relief in the magistrate division and his appeal to the district court was also unsuccessful. He then brought this appeal. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Craig was convicted of second degree murder in 1977 and in March, 1989, was granted parole. In September, 1989, Craig was ordered by his parole…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Herbert Sperling, Relator-Appellant v. Walter v. Fitzpatrick, Warden, West Street House of DetentionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. HassIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Robert Frederick Taylor v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Sivak v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Belue v. Parole and PardonsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
  4. Kevin Brown v. Idaho Parole Comm.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API