Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Boundary School Dist. No. 101

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2003No. 28629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This appeal is from an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to post a bond for costs before the defendants moved to dismiss due to the failure to file the bond as prescribed by the statutes governing an election contest. Because only one of the three causes of action alleged a challenge to a school district election, invoking the election statutes, and because the statutes do not expressly provide that the bond requirement is jurisdictional, we reverse the dismissal and remand the matter for further proceedings on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims.

FACTS…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rim View Trout Co. v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Orthman v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beehler v. Fremont CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Eller v. Idaho State PoliceIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hyde v. FisherIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Datum Construction, LLC v. Re Investment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Eller v. Idaho State PoliceIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API