Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1996No. CA CR 94-894Published

1DissentWendell L. Griffen, Judge

I dissent from the result announced in the prevailing opinion and its underlying reasoning. It is statutory law that a felony conviction cannot rest on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-89-lll(e)(l)(1987). Arkansas law also holds that a person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of an offense if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of an offense, he aids, agrees to aid, or attempts to aid the other person. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-2-403(a)(2)(Repl. 1993). The Arkansas Model Jury Instructions provide for accomplice status to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Cate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Shrader v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API