Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1985No. CA CR 85-122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance for which he received a sentence of seven and one-half years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. For reversal, appellant submits the trial court erred in (1) refusing to instruct the jury that Donald Flaherty and Wesley Atkinson were accomplices as a matter of law, (2) denying his motion for a directed verdict because there was insufficient corroborating evidence of co-conspirators’ and accomplices’ testimonies to sustain his conviction, (3) granting the State’s motion in limine, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Linell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Glick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Lear v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Cate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API