Legal Opinion

City of Fayetteville v. Stone

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1937No. 4-4685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButlee, J.

This suit was instituted by the appellees against the appellant to recover damages for the taking of a certain parcel of their lands for the purpose of widening, straightening and paving the west end of Wall street in the city of Fayetteville. Upon testimony adduced by the respective parties, the cause was submitted to the court sitting as a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the appellees in the sum of $540.

Two questions are presented upon appeal. The first is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict under the rule announced in Weidemeyer v. Little Rock, 157 Ark.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cribbs v. BenedictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  2. Weidemeyer v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Harger v. HargerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Chunn v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Kellensworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Kellensworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Urban Renewal Agency v. ShawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API