Legal Opinion
In re Slipyan
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
This is an application to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by the respondent, the Commissioner of Investigation of the State of New York. The subpoena was issued in the exercise of the investigatorial powers granted respondent by section 11 of the Executive Law. The investigation has to do with the “Activities of the State Liquor Authority, New York City”; “Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, and their members and employees.” Petitioner is an Alcoholic Beverage Control Investigator. The subpoena calls for the production of an “attached financial questionnaire, fully completed.” Quashing is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In re ColeNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- In re Remy Sportswear, Inc.New York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1959
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Combs v. NickersonNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Buholtz v. Board of Directors of Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.