Legal Opinion

Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1942No. 6445PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Certiorari to the Industrial Commission to review an order awarding compensation to the widow and five children of Lyman C. Jensen, deceased. The Utah Fuel Company, petitioner herein, is a self insurer under the Workmen’s. Compensation Act, Rev. St. 1933, 42-1-1 et seq.

Lyman C. Jensen, deceased, was an employee of the petitioner. He entered into employment with petitioner in September, 1940, at which time he submitted to a “whole-physical examination” and was employed. On January 3, 1941, deceased, while prying down some top coal in the course of his employment, stood upon a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Columbia Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chief Consol. Mining Co. v. SalisburyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Swiderski v. RaineySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Silcox v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moore v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Travelers Ins. Co. v. RowandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Crenshaw v. Pendleton Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Park Utah Consol. Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API