Legal Opinion
Fulani v. Brady
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1993No. 92 Civ. 0998 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The Defendants Nicholas F. Brady and Shirley D. Peterson (collectively, the “Federal Defendants”), joined by the Defendant League of Women Voters Education Fund (the “League”), have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) of Plaintiffs Lenora B. Fulani and Lenora B. Fulani for President (collectively, “Fulani”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fulani v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Fulani v. BentsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Fulani v. BentsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Fulani v. BentsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994