Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1996No. CR 96-103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant requests an extension of time to supplement the transcript and file a brief. He has filed a partial transcript, but seeks to complete the record which he states omits the following:(1) The February 7, 1995 suppression hearing, the court’s ruling, and the testimony or evidence bearing on the alleged coercive nature of the police in obtaining appellant’s confession.(2) The court’s side-bar conference regarding the appellant’s objection to the state’s question to Officer William Setterman, “[W]ere you or did you recover anything of an evidentiary value in the investigation of Shorty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crafton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Fountain v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API