Legal Opinion

Hickson v. Burkhart

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 5, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 5:86-0533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

This day the Court having considered solely1 the petition of Gloria Jean Hickson for leave to proceed herein in for-ma pauperis hereby grants such leave and the Clerk is directed to file without prepayment of costs or fees her complaint and accompanying motions. The Clerk is is further directed, however, to restyle this action so that the complaint reads in the Plaintiff’s name alone, the caption being henceforth GLORIA JEAN HICKSON, Plaintiff, vs. RON BURKHART, ETC. At this very early point in the litigation the Court declines to rule on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickson v. BurkhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1987
  2. Datz v. WhitworthDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  3. Moore v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API