Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosario-Delgado

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 30, 1999No. 98-3212PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant Luis Armando Rosario-Delgado appeals his life sentence for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, and for using a firearm during that crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The district court imposed a mandatory life sentence based on the “three-strikes” law codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c). Appellant argues that the district court applied § 3559(c) in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. Appellant also claims that § 3559(c) does not apply to him or, if it does, that the district court should have interpreted §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Thomas Lee FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Jimmy Lee Rasco Marcus A. MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luna Torres v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. Nevia Kevin AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Benjamin Langford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API