Legal Opinion

State v. Klokstad

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1981No. L 63932, CA 19345PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of driving while suspended. ORS 487.560. He objected to the state’s introduction of a photocopy of an envelope purporting to show a certified mailing to him of the notice of suspension on two grounds: (1) there is no provision in ORS 482.5801 for the introduction of the envelope; and (2) the "markings” on the envelope (the post office return stamp) were inadmissible hearsay. We affirm.

ORS 482.580, which provides for introduction of a certified copy of the suspension order, has to do with proof of the suspension; it has nothing to do with proof of notice.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GartzkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API