Legal Opinion

Heckman v. National Bank of Washington

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1964No. 3472PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

Sarah Heckman was sued as co-maker of a promissory note. She defended on the ground that the makers, Mr. and Mrs. Grist, had filed a petition for Wage Earners Plan under Chapter XIII of the National Bankruptcy Act; that the Plan had been approved by the Referee in Bankruptcy; that plaintiff .as an unsecured creditor of the Grists is compelled to accept payment under the Plan approved by the Referee; and that to permit recovery against her as co-maker would give the bank a preferred status against other creditors of the Grists. After a hearing the trial court granted a summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brice v. HerrmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Franklin William Schraer and Gertrude Gwendolyn Schraer, Debtors. Franklin William Schraer v. G. A. C. Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API