Legal Opinion

Brice v. Herrmann

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1957No. 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the appellee. The complaint claimed a balance of $1,662.63 up'o.n a promissory note executed by appellant for $2,500 which had become due by virtue of an acceleration provision in a second deed of trust securing the note. The note was payable to the order of one Verna Lee Anderson and it was claimed to have been subsequently negotiated to the appellee.

The answer denied the debt -and then recited the underlying facts of the transaction in order to show that the appellant was an accommodation maker or, in the words of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Holley v. SmalleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  3. Cline v. Receiver of Commercial Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter v. Purcellville National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Heckman v. National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API