Nantambu Noah Kambon, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The new-interpretation-of-federal-or-state-law exception to the two-year time bar set forth in Minnesota Statutes section 590.01, subdivision 4(b)(3) (2024), does not apply to appellant’s claims for postconviction relief. Affirmed. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-1211 Hennepin County Thissen, J. Nantambu Noah Kambon, Appellant, vs. Filed: July 16, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts State of Minnesota, Respondent. ________________________ Nantambu Noah Kambon, Bayport, Minnesota, pro se. Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Mary F. Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, Mark V. Griffin, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. ________________________ SYLLABUS The new-interpretation-of-federal-or-state-law exception to the two-year time bar set forth in Minnesota…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.