Legal Opinion

Webster v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 3, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from the summary dismissal of a petition for postconviction relief. The Superior Court ruled the appellant’s pro se motion to be time barred under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 because it was filed more than three years after his convictions were final. We hold that appellant's motion contained allegations of a constitutional violation sufficient to avoid the time limitation bar of Rule 61. We therefore reverse the Superior Court and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claims.

I

On July 23,1985, the appellant, Raymond R. Webster…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Outten v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Boyd v. GarraghtyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  5. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API