Legal Opinion
Ingersoll v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1962No. 14620PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Chief Judge.
This declaratory judgment action, arising under the Railway Labor Act, Section 151 et seq., Title 45, United States Code, Annotated, was filed in the District Court against The New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the Nickel Plate, and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, hereinafter referred to as the Brotherhood. The plaintiffs are employed as locomotive engineers by the Nickel Plate. The Brotherhood is the representative under the Railway Labor Act of the craft or class of engineers employed by the Nickel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fred W. Ingersoll, James W. Miller, Francis G. Greene, W. B. Harmon, Vincent E. Schiffler v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Third-Party-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962