Legal Opinion
Nemir v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 8, 2002No. 96-75830PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AS TO PLAINTIFF EXPERT THOMAS HORTON’S TESTIMONY
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Nemir v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales, 2001 WL 223775 (6th Cir.2001) (unpublished opinion) (per curiam), and defendants’ motion to exclude plaintiff expert Thomas Horton’s testimony regarding his test on the actual seat belt buckle, his testimony regarding other incidents of partial latching, and his video demonstration of other buckles, I now decide the admissibility of Horton’s remaining testimony. For…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zuzula v. ABB POWER T & D CO., INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003