Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2014No. 091994M; A149315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010; fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160; second-degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.354; reckless driving, ORS 811.140; and reckless endangerment, ORS 163.195. He appeals the resultant judgment of conviction, asserting that the trial court erred in admitting testimony from an officer trained as a drug-recognition expert (DRE) in the absence of an adequate scientific foundation for that evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err in admitting the officer’s testimony as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. AmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Beltran-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Janice Elaine Bragaw v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API