Legal Opinion

Zweifel v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to tbe Circuit Court for Milwaukee County.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The first question - to be considered in this case is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. It. is claimed on the part of the plaintiff in error, that the complaint upon which he was arrested and held to answer shows no jurisdiction of the magistrate or the court in which he was tried.

The complaint was under the bastardy act, made by Huida Crossett to a justice of the peace of Milwaukee county, stating, in substance, that she was pregnant with a child, which, if born alive, would be a bastard, and which child was begotten upon her body by the plaintiff in error, who was the father thereof.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duffies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. State ex rel. Drake v. DemossIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Werlein v. ElamoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Myuskovich v. State Ex Rel. OsbornWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Windahl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API