Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Babbitt Bros. Trading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1953No. 12963_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The Hoffmans, husband and wife, filed a complaint for damages against Babbitt Brothers Trading Company, a corporation.. Babbitt filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming the complaint “fails to* state a claim for relief against the-defendant”, which motion the court denied, and' Babbitt’s answer followed, putting the basis-for the action in issue. . Thereafter Babbitt-filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules, of Civil Procedure,. 28 U.S.C.A., and the court granted it. -The-Hoffmans appeal.
Briefly, according to the complaint, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Lane Bryant, Inc. v. Maternity Lane, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Shiosaki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Consolidated Electric Co. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of Gough Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Albers v. NoDak Racing Club, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.