Legal Opinion

Redmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D16-225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Jason Redmon’s judgment and sentence.

*307I.

The United States Supreme Court has recognized that there are circumstances where a court-appointed appellate counsel will, “after a conscientious examination,” find their client’s case to be “wholly frivolous.” See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In those circumstances, counsel should “so advise the court” and submit “a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.” Id.; see also In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149, 151 (Fla. 1991) (“The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kenya J. Williams v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API