Legal Opinion

Zontek v. Brown

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1992No. 49 M.D. 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

The named petitioners in this case, members or former members of the Western Westmoreland Municipal Authority (officials), have filed a motion for summary judgment, and the respondents, the State Ethics Commission and its members (commission) have filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The petition for review includes a quo warranto claim, through which the petitioners challenge the right of the commission’s members to hold office (Count I). The petition also contains a request for equitable relief (Count II) and a declaratory judgment claim (Count III).

The relevant…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Blackwell v. Com., State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schermer v. FranekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Spykerman v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Gwinn v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGrath v. State Board of DentistryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API