Yundt v. Hartrunft
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county. This was an action of trespass m eb armis, brought by Abraham Hartrunft, in the Superior Court of Chicago, against Allen C..Yundt. The declaration counts for the seduction of plaintiff’s wife by defendant. The plea of not guilty was filed. Afterward the venue was changed to the Kane Circuit Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county. This was an action of trespass m eb armis, brought by Abraham Hartrunft, in the Superior Court of Chicago, against Allen C..Yundt. The declaration counts for the seduction of plaintiff’s wife by defendant. The plea of not guilty was filed. Afterward the venue was changed to the Kane Circuit Court. A trial was had by the court and jury, which resulted in a verdict against defendant, and the jury assessed the damages at the sum of $5,000. A motion for a new trial was entered, but was overruled by the court, and judgment was rendered upon the…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker
This was an action of trespass vi et arrrds, commenced in the Superior Court of Chicago by appellee against appellant, for seducing and debauching his wife. The case was taken by a change of venue to the Kane Circuit Court. A trial was afterward had in that court by a jury, which resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for the sum of §5,000. A motion for a new trial was entered, which was overruled by the court, and judgment rendered on the verdict. And the cause is brought to this court by appeal, and various errors are assigned upon the record. But appellant’s counsel have confined their…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Daily v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Eick v. Perk Dog Food Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Johnson v. LuhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.