Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Shaw

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1989No. 1-87-2678Published

1DissentJustice McMORROW

The trial court sustained a motion to suppress defendant’s confession on the basis that the confession was involuntary because it was induced by a promise of help. Defendant made oral and written confessions that he mixed paint remover with the milk in his 14-month-old baby’s bottle, knowing that it would be fed to the child and in fact was ingested by the child. The trial court found that the defendant’s confession was based on a promise of help in the form of treatment rather than punishment. I respectfully dissent because I conclude that the interrogating officer’s remarks to the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. StachelekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. NoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. BaineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. VealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API