People v. Baine
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
Defendant, James A. Baine, was charged by informations with three separate burglaries. Upon the hearing of a motion to suppress, the trial court suppressed a confession given by defendant. The- State now appeals, contending that the trial court erroneously relied on an offer of leniency by a police officer as the single dispositive factor requiring suppression. We agree and therefore reverse the order of the circuit court.
The aforesaid informations were filed on January 23, 1979. Defendant was arraigned on Febmary 2,1979, and pleaded not guilty to all three charges. It was determined at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. SimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. PrudeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Hollenbach v. HaycraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. NoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- People v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. VealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- People v. SellarsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.