Commonwealth v. Strong
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
This is a direct appeal from the order of the trial court denying appellant’s petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (Hereinafter “the PCRA”). 42 Pa.C.S. § 9546(d). (Suspended August 11, 1997, reinstating subsection (d) from the 1988 Act). Appellant alleges that he is entitled to relief under the PCRA, as his conviction resulted from a constitu*459tional violation of due process in contravention of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(2)(i). As for the following reasons we find appellant is entitled to relief,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. PittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. Treiber, S., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.