Legal Opinion

Hasselback v. Sinton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

The appellees, who were holders and indorsees of a bill of exchange, sued the appellants as acceptors, and *546others as drawers and indorsers of the same. The bill was payable to the drawers, who were the immediate indorsers of the plaintiffs. At the September term, 1858, there was judgment against the drawers who were indorsers as aforesaid.

As to the other defendants, the record shows that the case was continued from term to term, for divers reasons, until the August term, 1860, at which time all the papers in the case were lost; in the language of the record, “ abstracted in open court, during…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe on the demise of Dunn v. HearickIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Unthank v. Henry County Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Warner v. HatfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Johnson v. VutrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weston v. LumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Scotten v. DivilbissIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Blizzard v. PhebusIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Wilson v. TruelockIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API