Legal Opinion

Doe on the demise of Dunn v. Hearick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1860PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Ejectment for the east half of the southeast quarter of section eleven, &c., in Switzerland county. The suit was instituted November 10, 1848, by the appellants. Vienna Hearick and others, who claimed title under one James Hearick, deceased, were the defendants.

The issues were submitted to the Court, who found for the defendants, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c.

The record contains the following agreement of facts:

On the 19th of May, 1818, one Samuel West, of Cincin*243nati, Ohio, entered the south-east quarter of section eleven, in township two north, of range one west, in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Ross v. Doe on the Demise of BarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Smith ex dem. Teller v. BurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1812

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Jones v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Wright v. KleylaIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Bauman v. GrubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Hawley v. ZigerlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API