Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1990No. 391 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYER, Judge:

Stress is an inescapable fact of daily life for many people. It also has a major negative impact on the health of American workers. Some people are more susceptible to stress injuries than others. Sometimes, stress can cause a “physical” impairment, like a heart attack.1 Sometimes the injury is not physical, but mental.2 When stress in the *266workplace causes or aggravates an injury, it might be compensable under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2,1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031.

This case involves a workmen’s compensation claim for mental…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Calabris v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Lowe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Squilla v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API