Waldo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BYER, Judge:
Stress is an inescapable fact of daily life for many people. It also has a major negative impact on the health of American workers. Some people are more susceptible to stress injuries than others. Sometimes, stress can cause a “physical” impairment, like a heart attack.1 Sometimes the injury is not physical, but mental.2 When stress in the *266workplace causes or aggravates an injury, it might be compensable under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2,1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031.
This case involves a workmen’s compensation claim for mental…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Calabris v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Lowe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Squilla v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.