Legal Opinion

State v. Bullock

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1979No. 15626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Bullock was co-defendant with one Austin in an aggravated robbery charge, incident to a holdup at the Carlton Hotel. He was convicted as charged, and appealed. We affirm the conviction.

All of the issues concerning the search and seizure raised by Bullock were at issue in the appeal of Bullock’s co-defendant, one Austin. That case 1 disposed of the same search and seizure issues, and is controlling here.

Bullock raises an additional issue viz., double jeopardy.

Bullock was on probation at the time of his arrest, and his probation was revoked prior to trial. Bullock claims this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Standlee v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. AustinUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brimhall v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KellUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. AbbottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Horsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Hatch v. DelandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Johns v. ShulsenUtah Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API