Johns v. Shulsen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant Steven M. Johns’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant’s primary contention is that his acquittal of charges in a criminal prosecution precludes, by collateral estoppel, a subsequent finding in an administrative parole revocation proceeding that he did commit the offenses. We reject appellant’s contention and hold that his parole was properly revoked. We further find that the revocation does not violate appellant’s right not to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, as guaranteed by federal and state…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daryl Standlee v. B. J. RhayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Petersen v. Utah Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Peak Alarm Co., Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Hatch v. DelandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Walker v. Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Johns v. ShulsenUtah Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.