Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Indictment against Harvey C. Miller and another for violating the interstate commerce act as amended. On plea in abatement.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, District Judge.

The defendants, Harvey C. Miller and Morris F. Miller, under indictment for certain alleged violations of the act of Congress to regulate interstate commerce and the acts amendatory thereof, have filed four pleas in abatement. To these pleas the government has presented demurrers, and counsel have been heard. Three of the pleas raise the precise questions as to the validity of the indictments which were presented in the kindred case of United States v. Merchants’ & Miners’ Transportation Company, 187 Fed. 355, tried at this term. These questions were argued elaborately,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Amis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API