State v. William F. Bokenyi
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 80. (dissenting). I join Justice Prosser's dissent. I write to point out that this review should be dismissed as improvidently granted,1 and that if review is granted, the prosecutor materially and substantially breached the plea agreement.
*63¶ 81. The majority opinion does not decide the issue that was the subject of the State's petition for review, and the State conceded in its petition for review that "although it disagree [d] with the court of appeals' resolution" of "whether the prosecutor's sentencing argument breached the plea agreement," the issue of whether the prosecutor materially…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SprangCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Nedvidek v. KuipersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.