Legal Opinion

State v. Sprang

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 26, 2004No. 03-2240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. Brian W Sprang pled guilty to and was convicted of first-degree sexual assault of a child contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1) (2001-02). Sprang appeals from that conviction and from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing on grounds that the State's remarks at sentencing violated the terms of his plea agreement.

¶ 2. We conclude that the prosecutor's remarks constituted a material and substantial breach of the parties' plea agreement. Although Sprang's counsel chose not to object to the prosecutor's remarks for reasonable strategic reasons, we nevertheless…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LiukonenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. State v. William F. BokenyiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. LichtyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API