Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 1983No. 83-1508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the third recent occasion for this court to revisit whether Norman Cannella can represent clients who were charged with crimes while Mr. Cannella was employed by the State Attorney’s office.

Petitioner, the state, petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to quash the order denying the state’s motion to disqualify Norman Cannella from representing Robert Lee Dixon, respondent, on first degree murder and armed robbery charges. We grant certiorari.

In the instant case, the state argues that Mr. Cannella’s signing of the respondent’s indictment for these charges demonstrates…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Endress v. CoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Sorci v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. State v. BrownCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API