Legal Opinion
Friedland v. Podhoretz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 23, 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
174 N.J. Super. 73 (1980)
415 A.2d 381
JERRY N. FRIEDLAND AND FRIEDLAND AND RUDOLPH, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MORDECAI PODHORETZ, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Passaic County.
Decided April 23, 1980.
Friedland and Rudolph for plaintiff (Dennis W. Blake appearing).
Tarella & Liftman for defendant (James A. Tarella appearing).
HUMPHREYS, J.S.C.
Plaintiff attorneys sue for fees, and also for libel and malicious prosecution, arising from defendant's filing a complaint with the Ethics Committee. The malicious prosecution action is brought pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:47A-1 which specifically…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maressa v. New Jersey MonthlySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Burke v. DeinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Matter of Hearing on Immunity for EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Stanwyck v. HorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- ZAGAMI, LLC v. CottrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.