Matter of Hearing on Immunity for Ethics
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
WILENTZ, C.J.
On January 31, 1984, the Court adopted various rules concerning attorney discipline. One of those rules provides that any grievant in an ethics matter or client in a fee arbitration case shall be absolutely immune from suit for testimony or communications given or made in connection with the fee arbitration or ethics proceeding. The Rule would effectively bar libel and slander suits, for instance, as well as malicious prosecution suits. The Rule’s text follows:(b) Immunity for Grievants and Clients.
Grievants in ethics matters and clients…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Passaic County Probation Officers' Ass'n v. County of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Lee v. W. E. Fuetterer Battery & Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Kerpelman v. BrickerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Edelstein v. WilentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Burke v. DeinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Field v. KearnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Parker v. M & T CHEMICALS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.