Legal Opinion

Security Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1924No. 2289PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The bank instituted this suit against A. W. Allen and his wife, Mrs. Eugenia Allen, alleging', in substance, in the original petition that on the 1st day of January, 1921, the defendants were husband and wife, and as such owned the property which is described in the petition; that Allen was indebted to plaintiff bank in certain sums, evidenced by a promissory note which was thereafter reduced to judgment in cause No. 116190, said judgment being in the sum of $1,297.06, and costs of suit, amounting to $5.40, dated October 28, 1921, and bearing 10 per cent, from its date. It is further alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maddox v. SummerlinTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Nye v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Leatherwood v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Poe v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Bonner v. GrigsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. StapfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. First Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Askey v. PowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Carmen Ramos v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Anderson v. BundickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API