Legal Opinion

Sigler v. Beebe

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Braxton County. Action by W. D. Sigler, against Dillon Beebe’s Son. Plaintiff had judgment, and, defendant’s motion for a new taial being overruled, he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Judge:

On the 7th day of April, 1894, W. D. Sigler brought an action of trespass on the case, in assumpsit, against Dillon Beebe, Jr., doing business in the name of Dillon Beebe’s Son, in the circuit court of Braxton county, to recover the price and value of certain lumber cut and sawed under a contract in writing dated June 16, 1892, which is fully set forth in the declaration, by which, in consideration of the the price therein mentioned, said Sigler agreed to cut, remove and saw into lumber one hundred and seventy-nine poplar trees and one walnut tree, belonging to said Dillon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. LaffertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Jones v. Singer Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ward v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Smith v. Parkersburg Co-Operative Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Amos v. StockertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bosley v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. McKainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API