Legal Opinion

DuPont Bayard v. Martin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 1953PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tunnell,

Justice, delivering opinion of the court:

On October 3, 1946, Joseph H. Martin, the defendant, entered into a contract with Star Publishing Company (hereinafter called “Star”), one of the plaintiffs, and an individual by the name of J. Edwin Carter. The contract provided that Martin was to do and refrain from doing a number of things of benefit to Star 1 and to sell Carter all of the issued and outstanding capital stock in Star. As part consideration for the contract, Martin was to receive $140,500 in money, of which $35,000 was paid down, and the remainder was to become due in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Maxwell Land Grant Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  5. Belle Isle Corporation v. MacBeanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  2. Aprahamian v. HBO & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  3. Martin v. Star Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
  4. Pauley Petroleum, Inc. v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
  5. Joseph v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API