Legal Opinion

Scott v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 7, 1992No. Record No. 0243-91-4PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFF, J.

In this appeal we are called upon to interpret the meaning of the phrase, “give testimony,” as used in Code § 18.2-435. 1 The appellant asserts that the meaning of “testimony” within the .intendment of the statute is restricted to sworn testimony subject to cross-examination in open court. The Commonwealth argues that such a restricted construction is not justified by precedent or logic and does not reflect the legislative intent in enacting Code § 18.2-435. We agree with the Commonwealth’s position and affirm.

On December 17, 1989, Teresa Ann Scott and her minor daughter,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Graybeal v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  4. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Newton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  4. Barrett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  5. Ganzie v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API